The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Tasting notes, varietals, grapes - anything related to wine
Jamie Kutch
 
Posts: 223
Joined: March 18th 2010, 5:49pm

The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #1  Postby Jamie Kutch » November 30th 2010, 10:17am

http://www.sanfranmag.com/story/the-fru ... resistance

Above is a well written piece on the 2010 vintage as well as more opinions on the alcohol debate.

It appears as though we are at a tipping point and no matter what your opinion on the alcohol subject, there are certainly more choices than ever to be made.

Between this article by Jordan Mackay, NY Times (Eric Asimov), SF Chronicle (Jon Bonne), Wall Street Journal (Lettie Teague), the voices for lower alcohol are growing, reaching and preaching. Sommeliers are also growing in numbers across the US and seeking much of the same to pair with their cuisines. Twitter is yet another voices which continues the debate and spreads it even further.

While the biggest publication, The Wine Spectator has yet to say anything on the subject, maybe it's being penned right now? There is no question there is a demand for low alcohol wines. Do you think the biggest teacher will share the gospel.
Jamie Kutch
Kutch Wines

Advertisement

User avatar
Scott Manlin
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: March 14th 2009, 2:18pm

The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #2  Postby Scott Manlin » November 30th 2010, 10:22am

No

But I definitely believe in the trend (2010 notwithstanding). :-)
The Hedonist
Keepin' the Dragon
User avatar
Bill Tex Landreth
SubscriberSubscriber
Colonel-General
 
Posts: 19708
Joined: January 27th 2009, 12:45pm
Location: Virgo Super Cluster

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #3  Postby Bill Tex Landreth » November 30th 2010, 10:23am

Jamie, are these numbers by design...are you shooting for a target...or are you going with what Mother Nature hands you?

Alcohol percentages for the past six vintages of Kutch’s pinot noir:
2005: 16.3%
2006: 15.3%
2007: 14.1%
2008: 13.9%
2009: 13.2%
2010: 12.8%
NOTHING goes over my head!... My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it.
Jamie Kutch
 
Posts: 223
Joined: March 18th 2010, 5:49pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #4  Postby Jamie Kutch » November 30th 2010, 10:27am

Good to hear from you Bill..

I don't understand your question but if you are asking if I did anything to the must to achieve those alcohol levels the answer is no. I picked early. I am picking on taste as well, I am not picking simply on numbers.
Jamie Kutch
Kutch Wines
User avatar
Bill Tex Landreth
SubscriberSubscriber
Colonel-General
 
Posts: 19708
Joined: January 27th 2009, 12:45pm
Location: Virgo Super Cluster

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #5  Postby Bill Tex Landreth » November 30th 2010, 10:40am

Just wanted to know if you started each of those harvests with a target ABV in mind with the intent of shooting for a lower ETOH and higher acid wine, or if you just rolled with what the vintage threw at you.

Lots of folks out there, I think, have a plan that they are after in regard to ripeness, acid, ABV, etc and can get creative to achive those goals....not that there is anything wrong with that approach at all. 12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.
NOTHING goes over my head!... My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it.
Kevin Shin
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 17th 2009, 1:23pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #6  Postby Kevin Shin » November 30th 2010, 10:41am

Jamie Kutch wrote:the voices for lower alcohol are growing, reaching and preaching. Sommeliers are also growing in numbers across the US and seeking much of the same to pair with their cuisines. Twitter is yet another voices which continues the debate and spreads it even further.


I don’t think the voice is that loud yet. If you are new to wine, you would prefer a hint of sweetness that comes from alcohol and jammy fruit doesn’t hurt either.

BTW if a wine maker wants high rating from Bob, go high alcohol or from Allen go low, pretty obvious. I will definitely buy/try Kutch wine to check where California can achieve phenolic ripeness @ below 13% alcohol.
Jamie Kutch
 
Posts: 223
Joined: March 18th 2010, 5:49pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #7  Postby Jamie Kutch » November 30th 2010, 10:49am

Bill Tex Landreth wrote:Just wanted to know if you started each of those harvests with a target ABV in mind with the intent of shooting for a lower ETOH and higher acid wine, or if you just rolled with what the vintage threw at you.

Lots of folks out there, I think, have a plan that they are after in regard to ripeness, acid, ABV, etc and can get creative to achive those goals....not that there is anything wrong with that approach at all. 12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


The yields in the vineyard were less than 1 ton per acre. The soil is well drained. The hang time was incredibly long in 2010 so these factors enabled the 12.8% alcohol wine to be made. The same wine was made in 2009 from Falstaff. Finished alcohol was also 12.8% alcohol. After aging for 18 months in barrel though, the alcohol elevated to 13.2% (right now). It too had incredibly low yields.

Last year in Savoy I had a clone of Pinot Noir called Martini which simply never got ripe (to the taste). I picked it at 26 brix and it soaked up to 29 brix - 17+% alcohol (without any water). In that case picking early would have been meaningless as it would have tasted like a green stalk. Instead I watered back and sold off the bulk juice wine in barrel. Since 2007 I had scrapped 25% of almost every vintage and often even more of my wine to maintain what I believe in. Lower alcohol, balanced and really good wines. Even with the right site we are still weather and vintage dependent. On the other side of the pond and for an inverse view, 03 Burgundy is a perfect example.
Jamie Kutch
Kutch Wines
User avatar
Ken Rudman
 
Posts: 2122
Joined: May 31st 2009, 10:50pm
Location: South Pasadena, CA

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #8  Postby Ken Rudman » November 30th 2010, 10:52am

Bill Tex Landreth wrote:12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


I believe that this year's release of the Arnot-Roberts Clary syrah was < 12%--and it's delicious.
User avatar
Bill Tex Landreth
SubscriberSubscriber
Colonel-General
 
Posts: 19708
Joined: January 27th 2009, 12:45pm
Location: Virgo Super Cluster

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #9  Postby Bill Tex Landreth » November 30th 2010, 10:56am

Ken Rudman wrote:
Bill Tex Landreth wrote:12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


I believe that this year's release of the Arnot-Roberts Clary syrah was < 12%--and it's delicious.


Wow. A domestic syrah under 12%...hell, under 15% is a rarity.
NOTHING goes over my head!... My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it.
User avatar
Ian Dorin
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: January 27th 2009, 1:39pm
Location: Springfield, NJ

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #10  Postby Ian Dorin » November 30th 2010, 10:57am

Ken Rudman wrote:
Bill Tex Landreth wrote:12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


I believe that this year's release of the Arnot-Roberts Clary syrah was < 12%--and it's delicious.


08 North Coast from AR is 12.4. Also, Wind Gap Armagh 08 is 12.7. So much for Syrah being high octane :)

Jaime, lord knows I hope you are right.
ITB, Wine Library in NJ.

“I spe
User avatar
Robert.Fleming
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 6682
Joined: June 11th 2009, 1:58pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #11  Postby Robert.Fleming » November 30th 2010, 11:03am

Ken Rudman wrote:
Bill Tex Landreth wrote:12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


I believe that this year's release of the Arnot-Roberts Clary Syrah was < 12%--and it's delicious.
Their 2009 Green Island Vyd. Chardonnay clocks in at 12.4%, and the 2008 Hudson Vyd 'North Block' Syrah is under 12% IIRC. Both excellent, flavorful, balanced wines. The low alcohol is largely a function of their decision to seek out very cool vineyard sites.

Jamie, do you do the same?
User avatar
Jon Troutman
 
Posts: 385
Joined: November 9th 2009, 3:10pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #12  Postby Jon Troutman » November 30th 2010, 11:17am

Bill Tex Landreth wrote:Jamie, are these numbers by design...are you shooting for a target...or are you going with what Mother Nature hands you?

Alcohol percentages for the past six vintages of Kutch’s pinot noir:
2005: 16.3%
2006: 15.3%
2007: 14.1%
2008: 13.9%
2009: 13.2%
2010: 12.8%


Jamie, I'm curious: Mackay writes that your change in preference for lower alcohol wines led to the style change. Has this been a struggle with pleasing your customers / people on your mailing list? In other words, did you have a core group of people come to know and love your '05 and '06 wines, only to be disappointed by your transition to figures in the 12 and 13% abv range?
Birthdays was the worst days, no
User avatar
Richard T r i m p i
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 3868
Joined: September 11th 2009, 1:29pm
Location: Close to William Penn's Walking Purchase

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #13  Postby Richard T r i m p i » November 30th 2010, 11:38am

Jon Troutman wrote:Has this been a struggle with pleasing your customers / people on your mailing list? In other words, did you have a core group of people come to know and love your '05 and '06 wines, only to be disappointed by your transition to figures in the 12 and 13% abv range?
Good question Jon. My reaction was the opposite and the disappointment prompted me to miss the transition.

RT
User avatar
larry schaffer
 
Posts: 3010
Joined: January 28th 2009, 10:26am
Location: Santa Ynez Valley, CA

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #14  Postby larry schaffer » November 30th 2010, 11:48am

Interesting questions, Jamie, and one that only one person can answer, and I don't believe he will . . .

It is difficult to base any overall statements about 'the state of the wine biz as it relates to ABV's' based on the 2010 vintage. Many a winemaker was 'forced' to make wine in a certain style because of what Mother Nature dealt, not necessarily out of choice. Should the vintage have been similar to 2005, one wonders what many a winemaker would have done.

There is no doubt many a producer that is leaning toward making lower ABV wines with higher acid levels . . . AKA wines that will work better with food in general. And I do believe we will see this trend continue . . . but I do not see this trend 'taking over the industry' as of now. Will the general public enjoy a sub 12% alc syrah, especially upon release and just popping and pouring? No, they won't . . . and herein lies the problem. Some of these wines require longer cellaring times, and some requiring quite a bit of decanting or air time. The general consumer simply does not understand this concept, nor are we as an industry educating them as to why we do this.

I'm hopeful that markets will exist for all styles of wines for that is what makes our industry as 'entertaining' and enjoyable as it is . . .

Cheers!
larry schaffer
tercero wines
User avatar
Cris Whetstone
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 10379
Joined: January 27th 2009, 2:09pm
Location: OC, CA

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #15  Postby Cris Whetstone » November 30th 2010, 12:13pm

I thought wine by the numbers was supposed to be bad? [scratch.gif]
WetRock

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true." - Francis Bacon

"I had taken two finger-bowls of champagne and the scene had changed before my eyes into something significant, elemental, and profound." - F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby
User avatar
Bill Tex Landreth
SubscriberSubscriber
Colonel-General
 
Posts: 19708
Joined: January 27th 2009, 12:45pm
Location: Virgo Super Cluster

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #16  Postby Bill Tex Landreth » November 30th 2010, 12:14pm

Cris Whetstone wrote:I thought wine by the numbers was supposed to be bad? [scratch.gif]


That's ratings numbers, you nimrod.
NOTHING goes over my head!... My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it.
User avatar
Paul H Galli
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: July 1st 2009, 2:55pm
Location: Monterey Peninsula

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #17  Postby Paul H Galli » November 30th 2010, 12:19pm

larry schaffer wrote:Interesting questions, Jamie, and one that only one person can answer, and I don't believe he will . . .

It is difficult to base any overall statements about 'the state of the wine biz as it relates to ABV's' based on the 2010 vintage. Many a winemaker was 'forced' to make wine in a certain style because of what Mother Nature dealt, not necessarily out of choice. Should the vintage have been similar to 2005, one wonders what many a winemaker would have done.

There is no doubt many a producer that is leaning toward making lower ABV wines with higher acid levels . . . AKA wines that will work better with food in general. And I do believe we will see this trend continue . . . but I do not see this trend 'taking over the industry' as of now. Will the general public enjoy a sub 12% alc syrah, especially upon release and just popping and pouring? No, they won't . . . and herein lies the problem. Some of these wines require longer cellaring times, and some requiring quite a bit of decanting or air time. The general consumer simply does not understand this concept, nor are we as an industry educating them as to why we do this.

I'm hopeful that markets will exist for all styles of wines for that is what makes our industry as 'entertaining' and enjoyable as it is . . .

Cheers!


Larry, you make a lot of good points.
In our "instant gratification" society, many people don't want to age a wine much past a couple of years and want to pop & pour....

I can appreciate various winemakers leaning towards making lower octane pinot, but quite frankly, many if not most of the pinot vineyards have micro-climates which do not support ripening at lower alcohol levels. Plus they often contain clones which also do not support ripening at lower Brix levels.

I believe the Kutch-Mon did his homework as to vineyards that would foster ripening at lower sugar levels.

Plus, many winemakers plan on picking very ripe grapes with the idea of watering them back.
So they'll never make lower octane wines.

I agree with you 100% that all types of pinot should be available.
Everybody to their own taste the old lady said as she kissed the cow.... [cheers.gif]

You know my stance on 15% pinots (and chards for that matter)

TTT
Opinot, not Oporto...
User avatar
Sean Moore
 
Posts: 1004
Joined: June 17th 2009, 3:55pm
Location: Seattle

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #18  Postby Sean Moore » November 30th 2010, 12:27pm

Kevin Shin wrote:BTW if a wine maker wants high rating from Bob, go high alcohol or from Allen go low, pretty obvious. I will definitely buy/try Kutch wine to check where California can achieve phenolic ripeness @ below 13% alcohol.


With respect to Jamie's wines, the WA scores have gone up as the alcohol has gone down; although admittedly, only two vintages have been reviewed (the 06's and 07's - and of course there are other differences between the wines specifically and the vintages generally). It will be interesting to see what RP thinks of the 2008 and especially the 2009's and 10's. Regardless, I'm looking forward to the new releases. While I haven't barrel-tasted the newer stuff, I find the 08 to be packed with flavor and a fine achievement in a challenging vintage (and I'm not a low-alcohol missionary - last week's bottles included an Aubert Reuling and an Edmunds St. John Bone-Jolly and I had no difficulty enjoying them both).
TomHill
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: July 28th 2009, 9:21am
Location: LosAlamos, NM

Adam..

Post #19  Postby TomHill » November 30th 2010, 12:31pm

I thought Adam Lee made a very good point in his comments reply.
Tom
Kevin Shin
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 17th 2009, 1:23pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #20  Postby Kevin Shin » November 30th 2010, 12:35pm

Sean Moore wrote:
Kevin Shin wrote:BTW if a wine maker wants high rating from Bob, go high alcohol or from Allen go low, pretty obvious. I will definitely buy/try Kutch wine to check where California can achieve phenolic ripeness @ below 13% alcohol.


With respect to Jamie's wines, the WA scores have gone up as the alcohol has gone down; although admittedly, only two vintages have been reviewed (the 06's and 07's - and of course there are other differences between the wines specifically and the vintages generally). It will be interesting to see what RP thinks of the 2008 and especially the 2009's and 10's. Regardless, I'm looking forward to the new releases. While I haven't barrel-tasted the newer stuff, I find the 08 to be packed with flavor and a fine achievement in a challenging vintage (and I'm not a low-alcohol missionary - last week's bottles included an Aubert Reuling and an Edmunds St. John Bone-Jolly and I had no difficulty enjoying them both).


My apologies for the over generalization. I was referring to 95+ RP, most if not all display sweet fruit expression.
User avatar
Bill Tex Landreth
SubscriberSubscriber
Colonel-General
 
Posts: 19708
Joined: January 27th 2009, 12:45pm
Location: Virgo Super Cluster

Re: Adam..

Post #21  Postby Bill Tex Landreth » November 30th 2010, 12:35pm

TomHill wrote:I thought Adam Lee made a very good point in his comments reply.
Tom


Indeed.
NOTHING goes over my head!... My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it.
User Avatar
Todd Hamina
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 1315
Joined: February 3rd 2009, 3:16pm
Location: McMinnville, OR

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #22  Postby Todd Hamina » November 30th 2010, 12:55pm

I figure if both Harvey and Dr. J can give me 90/91/92 for wines that are 12.8 to 13.3 then things have begun to shift. Then again, they just might like pretty Pinot noir...

I should add that whole clusters soak up alcohol.
leslie mead
 
Posts: 79
Joined: June 2nd 2009, 2:47pm
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #23  Postby leslie mead » November 30th 2010, 12:57pm

The World of Pinot Noir (WOPN) is hosting a panel discussion on this topic on Friday, March 4th at Wild Horse Vineyards in Atascadero. So far, Eric Asimov, Raj Parr, Jim Clendenen, Adam Tolmach. Josh Jensen, Adam Lee, and Michael Browne have all agreed to participate. It should be a good one!
Michael Powers
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: March 6th 2010, 2:47pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #24  Postby Michael Powers » November 30th 2010, 1:08pm

I don't know that WS has been silent on this issue, but I do think that they have a vested interest thus far in the fruit bomb, if only slightly less so than the WA. I saw a James Molesworth editorial while perusing the latest Spectator at a restaurant the other day where he supposes the natural wine movement to be "dead on the vine" (his quote I do believe). While only an editorial, it still seems a shout out for the status quo of the past years of higher octane and seems to refute the idea of a revolution of finesse.

But mostly just look at this year's top ten list. While CA may be putting out the aforementioned lovely lighter weight Syrahs, WS has championed some very big-boned wines. Personally I wonder how many of these periodicals would still be listening to the band as the water washed over the deckchairs.

Re Adam's comments, are they really that great? I think it is fair to assume that as the US public becomes more knowledgeable about wine that they will also consider cellaring wine at a greater rate than before, that they will demand more properly aged wines from restaurants, and that, most importantly, they will pick the wine that is at the most appropriate stage of aging rather than simply shelling out for the biggest bomb in the book or on the shelf as so many have done for so long. Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.
User avatar
John Morris
(Online)
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 6725
Joined: June 21st 2009, 2:09pm
Location: New York City

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #25  Postby John Morris » November 30th 2010, 1:09pm

Robert.Fleming wrote:
Ken Rudman wrote:
Bill Tex Landreth wrote:12.8% is about the lowest I have seen that I can remember on modern wines of any varietal...again, nothing wrong with that at all.


I believe that this year's release of the Arnot-Roberts Clary Syrah was < 12%--and it's delicious.
Their 2009 Green Island Vyd. Chardonnay clocks in at 12.4%, and the 2008 Hudson Vyd 'North Block' Syrah is under 12% IIRC. Both excellent, flavorful, balanced wines. The low alcohol is largely a function of their decision to seek out very cool vineyard sites.

Jamie, do you do the same?


Many of Copain's 09 pinots came in around 12%.
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true." -- variously attributed and constantly corroborated
User avatar
G. D y e r
 
Posts: 2174
Joined: December 26th 2009, 5:07pm

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #26  Postby G. D y e r » November 30th 2010, 1:10pm

Paul H Galli wrote:In our "instant gratification" society, many people don't want to age a wine much past a couple of years and want to pop & pour....


Just one quibble here. Do you really think that in medieval Europe most consumers aged their wines? Or even in the 19th century? I suspect only a minority of wealthy nobles with cellars aged wine. Most likely the average consumer (serfs and tradesmen, perhaps) bought wine and drank it the same day.

Probably what is new is that the modern equivalent of landed nobility expect high end wine to be instantly drinkable. But for the middle classes and lower, it's probably business as usual: buy, then consume.
Greg

In that way, he is like co
Andrew P. Vingiello
 
Posts: 48
Joined: February 3rd 2009, 3:24pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #27  Postby Andrew P. Vingiello » November 30th 2010, 1:26pm

Michael Powers wrote:Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.


Michael...can you tell me for sure where this so called "movement" started? Was it the chicken or the egg? The winemaker or the consumer? I quite often feel this "movement" is about selling articles and selling wine...whether or not you believe in what you write or what you make. Please...educate me.
--------------------------------
User avatar
Sean Moore
 
Posts: 1004
Joined: June 17th 2009, 3:55pm
Location: Seattle

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #28  Postby Sean Moore » November 30th 2010, 1:30pm

Kevin Shin wrote:My apologies for the over generalization. I was referring to 95+ RP, most if not all display sweet fruit expression.


I'm not suggesting that you've over-generalized; but rather, noting that the generalization doesn't hold true with respect to Jamie's wines - or at least not yet, but it sure might after the 08-10 reviews come out (assuming that RP gets to them). After all, the 07 was still at 14.1%.
User avatar
Paul H Galli
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: July 1st 2009, 2:55pm
Location: Monterey Peninsula

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #29  Postby Paul H Galli » November 30th 2010, 1:46pm

Michael Powers wrote: Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.


Michael,

As someone who has tasted with Adam many times (And debated him many times on many subjects), he has no prejudice against lower alcohol wines and doesn't wear a tin foil hat. I also don't believe he particularly likes +15% Pinots.

Since 2004, Adam has lowered the octane on his Pinots and I find them to be balanced and rarely exhibiting heat.

TTT
Opinot, not Oporto...
User avatar
Scott Butler
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 5326
Joined: January 28th 2009, 10:32am
Location: Greenville, SC

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #30  Postby Scott Butler » November 30th 2010, 1:59pm

Paul H Galli wrote:
Michael Powers wrote: Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.


Michael,

As someone who has tasted with Adam many times (And debated him many times on many subjects), he has no prejudice against lower alcohol wines and doesn't wear a tin foil hat. I also don't believe he particularly likes +15% Pinots.

Since 2004, Adam has lowered the octane on his Pinots and I find them to be balanced and rarely exhibiting heat.

TTT



2004 certainly was a pinnacle for many regarding alc%. Like you, I feel that there is a good variety of Pinot Noir styles on the market today, which I am certainly happy about.
Best: Alban Lorraine 03, August West Graham PN 05, Casanova Di Neri Tenuta Nuova 01, Clos Erasmus 04, Clos Pepe VS 05, DRC Echezeaux 85, Loring Sharons 99, Marcassin Three Sisters PN 02, Rieussec 89&01, Rochioli River Block Chard 06, Rochioli West Block PN 02&05, Saxum JBV 08, SQN Imposter McCoy 97, SQN Midnight Oil 01, Torii Mor Amelia Rose 98
User avatar
Linda Baehr
SubscriberSubscriber
Yeast Wrangler..& Bitch
 
Posts: 12577
Joined: January 27th 2009, 2:31pm
Location: I'm a Napacat

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #31  Postby Linda Baehr » November 30th 2010, 2:01pm

leslie mead wrote:The World of Pinot Noir (WOPN) is hosting a panel discussion on this topic on Friday, March 4th at Wild Horse Vineyards in Atascadero. So far, Eric Asimov, Raj Parr, Jim Clendenen, Adam Tolmach. Josh Jensen, Adam Lee, and Michael Browne have all agreed to participate. It should be a good one!


Ahem............Templeton. [basic-smile.gif]
ITB..................................but you guys knew that already, right?
Here's a link to my art site:

Buy a painting from a starving artist!
Michael Powers
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: March 6th 2010, 2:47pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #32  Postby Michael Powers » November 30th 2010, 2:02pm

Paul H Galli wrote:
Michael Powers wrote: Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.


Michael,

As someone who has tasted with Adam many times (And debated him many times on many subjects), he has no prejudice against lower alcohol wines and doesn't wear a tin foil hat. I also don't believe he particularly likes +15% Pinots.

Since 2004, Adam has lowered the octane on his Pinots and I find them to be balanced and rarely exhibiting heat.

TTT


Paul,

I do not mean to insult, I think Adam makes very reasoned points which he truly believes in; I merely think that he often seems to become very sensitive, and yes perhaps too sensitive, when subjects like this are touched upon; And yes, I am very aware that he makes a wide range of pinots from a wide range of areas. Some I have liked, others I have found too sweet/ripe.
Michael Powers
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: March 6th 2010, 2:47pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #33  Postby Michael Powers » November 30th 2010, 2:14pm

Andrew P. Vingiello wrote:
Michael Powers wrote:Adam seems very sincere in his beliefs, but he also seems to believe that there is nothing wrong with extremely ripe wines, that the idea of natural wine is some sort of seditious plot against domestic winegrowers, and that the very concept of a movement towards lighter wines is anathema and should be shouted down. I do not agree with him on any of these things.


Michael...can you tell me for sure where this so called "movement" started? Was it the chicken or the egg? The winemaker or the consumer? I quite often feel this "movement" is about selling articles and selling wine...whether or not you believe in what you write or what you make. Please...educate me.



I don't know that I could "tell you where this movement started," but if I were to guess I would suppose that there is no real beginning, that there over the course of the past decade or two public taste favored high alcohol, very ripe, dense, concentrated, hedonistic, etc. wines, the type hyped by WA and WS, and that there were always those who bucked this trend and favored wines with less ripeness and concentration. For whatever reasons I also believe that the trend towards heaviness reached a maximum density, the pendulum paused and has begun to swing back with more interest gained in the lighter style of wine. But I would certainly hesitate to name a beginning, since so many winemakers, in the US and abroad, have never embraced a higher octane, sleekly smooth, internationalized style. But if you doubt such a style exists, or that a movement peaked and headed the other way, I would probably point to a region like Barolo, where it seems many producers have given up the modern style they picked up just a short time ago. Others here can speak more eloquently than I on that subject, but I see it mentioned both here and on other boards, as a good example of this phenomenon.

Of course you could mean some other "movement" perhaps the idea of natural wine, with all its inherent conflicts. I really don't want to digress into a fight for the same ground so often battled for here, so I will leave it at that. I'm not claiming I know, it just looks that way to me, in the time I have paid attention to wine.

In any case, I don't think that it is merely a construct of vintners or journalists that for a time there was a style of wine which became popularized that was very concentrated and tended towards high alcohol and that the style has since lost some popularity, particularly where it was ill suited to begin with, resulting in blowback and something of a return to a lighter bodied, lower alcohol style in the hopes of gaining nuance and delicacy in the exchange. None of this is whole hog, it is more like watching currents, but i feel very confident that this is clearly the case.
User avatar
Ray Walker
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: April 23rd 2009, 3:10pm
Location: Nuits-Saint-Georges, Côte d'Or, France

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #34  Postby Ray Walker » November 30th 2010, 2:37pm

...and the band played on...

If I read one more article on the merits of New World Pinot noir using Burgundy as the basis of what it should be....

When did this stop being about having fun and appreciating differences (for both the wine and the company it is shared with)?
ITB
Maison ILAN
User avatar
Scott Butler
SubscriberSubscriber
 
Posts: 5326
Joined: January 28th 2009, 10:32am
Location: Greenville, SC

Re: The Fruit Bomb Resistance...

Post #35  Postby Scott Butler » November 30th 2010, 2:43pm

Ray Walker wrote:...and the band played on...

If I read one more article on the merits of New World Pinot noir using Burgundy as the basis of what it should be....

When did this stop being about having fun and appreciating differences (for both the wine and the company it is shared with)?


Amen.
Best: Alban Lorraine 03, August West Graham PN 05, Casanova Di Neri Tenuta Nuova 01, Clos Erasmus 04, Clos Pepe VS 05, DRC Echezeaux 85, Loring Sharons 99, Marcassin Three Sisters PN 02, Rieussec 89&01, Rochioli River Block Chard 06, Rochioli West Block PN 02&05, Saxum JBV 08, SQN Imposter McCoy 97, SQN Midnight Oil 01, Torii Mor Amelia Rose 98

Return to Wine Talk