If I’ve got enough pennies to get a pair of one or the other, but not both, which is the one to get? Or, if you don’t want to pick a “better” one, what are the main differences to consider?
And whichever I buy, I’ll hold onto them for a good while, so don’t worry about how they would show this year or anything.
BTW Rhys costs me a lot of money!
Not discounting David’s observation either. This is my feeling after drinking a few that Skyline is the best terroir that Kevin has in California.
If you can’t decide, just buy Bearwallow and leave a few bottles of Swan and Skyline out there for shlubs like me to maybe get on a wish list. Allocation: zero…
Nice first-world problem, Chris. I have never opened a Swan Terrace, but I did open a 2008 Skyline by accident once. I believe it is the best California Pinot I have ever had. Swan Terrace might be just as good for all I know, but my guess is you would not be disappointed if you chose Skyline.
Both are excellent. If I had to choose one, I’d probably pick Skyline and then buy some Alpine to get a sense of what the Swan Terrace is like, but it’s close.
I had thought that Swan Terrace was Rhys’ best wine until I tasted the 2012 Skyline Pinot. Wow. Best Rhys, best Calif Pinot ever for me. Extraordinary – that would be my choice. Haven’t tasted the 2012 Swan though.
Good luck - can’t go wrong,
Peter
Chris, I tasted through the entire lineup of Rhys 2012s last February, and it was very instructive to taste them all side-by-side. My take leads me to echo what others have said about lumping it and buying both, but if it really, truly has to be just one, for me it would easily be the Skyline. It’s stunning. Powerful yet elegant, focused and pure, minerals and florals. And I like Don’s “kaleidoscopic” descriptor.
Joanne has had plenty of time to feel the angst for me given all the wine stuff we have done the past few years. Dude, a bottle of ST and Skyline is not going to even nudge her.