I am new to the forum but I have read and benefited a lot from the posts and chains here!
I am hoping to get your opinions on the authenticity of 3 bottles of Petrus from 1989, 1994 and 2000 which have been offered to me from a private cellar. The pictures are included below.
Your comments will be greatly appreciated! Merry Christmas All!
unless they are really cheap, hard pass. First bottle looks like water damage. This ain’t from the 1940s. Why wrap cellophane around the other labels? Unless you may be trying to disguise some defect?
My guess is that the cellophane is simply in an effort to keep the already disintegrating labels somewhat intact. How well do you know the seller, and are you paying a premium for these?
It’s pretty common, particularly if the label is already frayed. I’ve bought cellophane-wrapped bottles from Chambers Street. Never gave it a second thought.
I’d be much less worried about the cellophane (common as a preventative measure for label decay), and more about the provenance. The paper looks good and the capsules are the right Petrus red, but the only way you can really feel confident is by cutting the capsules and getting a look at the cork. If you’re very serious about buying, the seller may be willing to do this for you. If not, you shoot your shot and hope for the best.
I’m also not sure about when Petrus began branding the glass with their namesake, as it appears in the 2000 vintage above, but not the '94 or '89. Can anyone chime in on this? Possibly a domestic/export difference?
Between the '89 and '00 the tendrils curl in different shapes, the grape clusters are different shapes, the fleur de lis type curls next to both of his shoulders are different, the detail behind the character in the '89 is not there in the '00, his shroud is different, and the labels generally look like different print qualities. The closer I look, the more small changes there seem to be, really weird.