5 tasters participated in this tasting. I think everyone felt the Courtin was the best; opinions on the Rose were somewhat varied; everyone enjoyed the Remy Massin.
I recall prior conversation on this board about the Hebrart Rose: unfortunately, my experience mirrors the unfortunate experiences detailed by others — to put it bluntly, the wine was “just weird,” and not particularly pleasant. It did improve somewhat with air, and a relatively warmer serving temperature, but it never got to “good.”
The Remy Massin was, perhaps, the most intriguing wine of the trio, notwithstanding the fact that I preferred the Courtin. The Courtin is simply more my style. But that Remy Massin — it really came across as being pretty packed, and situated for a greater future. It is surprisingly dense for how dry it is. I will likely buy a couple more to see how it develops in the cellar.
2014 Marie Courtin Champagne Efflorescence Extra Brut - France, Champagne (12/12/2020)
– popped and poured –
– tasted non-blind over 2 hours –
– 100% Pinot Noir –
– etched code at bottom of bottle: LE14D1119ND –
NOSE: very light — light-fruited for a Blanc de Noirs; pleasant, but pretty straightforward.
BODY: frothy; light bodied.
TASTE: excellent; vinuous — “winey”; a bit salty; dry; 12% alc. not noticeable; easily a re-buy for me; I do wonder if a year or two might help this flesh-out some, not that it needs it, however, as I find it quite pleasant right now.
NV Marc Hébrart Champagne Premier Cru Brut Rosé - France, Champagne (12/12/2020)
– popped and poured –
– tasted non-blind over 2 hours –
– 55% Chardonnay, 38.5% Pinot Noir, 6.5% Mareuil Rouge –
NOSE: light; a bit leafy; very light aroma of red berries.
BODY: salmon color; medium-light bodied.
TASTE: something a bit milky and weedy going on — fairly weird; medium-strength raspberry jam note on the finish. Not a re-buy for me.
2012 Remy Massin Champagne Brut Millésimé - France, Champagne (12/12/2020)
– popped and poured –
– tasted non-blind over a couple hours –
– 60% Chardonnay, 40% Pinot Noir –
NOSE: a bit yeasty and buttery; this has an overall “bright” aromatic profile.
BODY: medium-light bodied.
TASTE: concentrated light fruits; high acidity; dry, but with a surprising richness to it; attractive QPR @ $40; this certainly seems like it will age well, for those so-inclined; it’s a re-buy for me. Gut impression: low 90s.