Whisk(e)y Shelf Life

I tried searching to see if there was a thread regarding this topic but could not easily locate one. Before getting into wine, I was primarily into Scotch and Japanese whisky and to a lesser extent bourbons. Over the last couple of years, I’ve drank primarily wine but still enjoy whisky especially depending on the company. I’ve heard conflicting schools of thought that after 10 years or so, the contents may be impacted even if unopened. On the other hand, been told that unopened liquor may evolve but at a glacial pace that may be unnoticeable as long as oxygen hasn’t found a way through. They are all being stored upright and kept away from direct heat/sunlight but wondering if I’ve been doing these bottles a disservice especially as they begin to creep in years.

On another note, if a bottle was opened and 3/4 or 1/2 or 1/4 liquid remained, I imagine that the shelf life will decrease if the remaining amount continues to lessen?

I always use Private Preserve to prevent oxidation on my bottles, seems to work well.

Great article on long term whiskey storage:

After over two years of researching, waiting, tasting, and documenting our findings, I’ll leave you with a few conclusions, some advice, and some things to consider when it comes to storing your bourbon.

‍Store your bourbon in a cool, dark place and most importantly out of direct sunlight. I’ve probably beaten this concept to death by this point, but the fact is sunlight, for whatever reason, did some some serious damage to the bourbon inside the sample bottles. Interestingly, the amber bottle stored in direct sunlight fared much better than the clear bottles, though amber bourbon bottles are few and far between in the real world. Additionally, while the refrigerator stored samples fared well, even over a 24 month period, they were only nominally different tasting than the room temperature stored samples at each of the sample intervals. They were also sealed with screw caps. Potential long term cork seal issues might exist as the low humidity environment inside a refrigerator could cause a cork to dry out more quickly.

‍Bourbon changes over time relative to the introduction of air within the container, but maybe not as much as we might have thought. Whether the bourbon gets better or worse will depend on the particular bourbon, the drinker, and the duration of storage, but this experiment proved it can change even if only a minimal extent. The changes from 6, to 12, to 24 month intervals suggest the interaction with air inside the container may not cause a steady degradation over time, but simply a metamorphosis of the bourbon’s flavor profile. I had hoped to analyze the samples on a mass spectrometer, but the stars didn’t align so our results are completely by taste. But this helped answer one of my most burning questions, which was if a ⅓ fill bottle meant it was time to finish it off, transfer to smaller containers, or consider an inert gas like Private Preserve. After running this experiment and taking notes on other real world long term and low fill level situations, the evidence suggests there is only a minimal impact on the bourbon itself and I’m personally much less worried about it. But would it be much different after 5 years? 10? That I can’t answer at this point.

‍Periodically opening bourbon and re-sealing over time is OK. The continual introduction of air causes excessive oxidation and ultimately ruins bourbon. The drink down samples were intended to represent a real world situation where a bottle was periodically opened, poured, and then sealed again. Based on our findings this yielded minimal change to the flavor of the bourbon over time, suggesting that it’s not something to worry too much about. Good news for many of those dusty bar pours.

‍Does the closure material matter? As far as closures go, all of our samples utilized conical seal screw cap closures. The intent was to ensure an airtight seal for the experiment, ultimately focusing in on the effects of the conditions and fill levels thereby eliminating any bias due to closure failure. The non-sunlight stored samples all fared pretty well. But not so with the sunlight samples. It is possible that the air within the direct sunlight samples heated up (the “hot car effect”), causing some kind of interaction between the air and the plastic material the conical seals are made out of. This might explain the rubber / plastic / paint thinner scent and flavors we all noticed with those samples, which became increasingly more prominent as fill level decreased. With that in mind, the samples stored in clear bottles and in direct sunlight also lost a great deal of color over the course of time, a change that would not correlate to the interaction of air with the conical plastic seal but had an effect on the bourbon nonetheless. Could the conical seals have been the reason for the flavor degradation as we noticed? If the bottles had been corked would the results have been different? Would the bourbon have smelled and tasted like cork?

‍The volume of liquid inside along with relative humidity of the outside air might affect the viability of a cork. A friend of mine liked the style of his bottle of Blanton’s so much that he reused it to store Macadamia nuts. Blanton’s has a natural cork, and it became quite loose over time to the extent the cork shrunk so much that it provided no seal at all. This got me thinking - what effect does the existence of liquid, or a specific volume of liquid, within a bottle have on a cork and its ability to expand enough to create an adequate seal? After all, wine is stored on its side to keep the cork from drying out but that’s not the case with bourbon.

What better way to test than with an informal experiment. I started with an empty bottle of 1792 Ridgemont Reserve placed on a shelf in my office, which gets indirect sunlight. Left untouched for about three months, I discovered the cork had shrunk to an extent that it no longer created a seal - I could pull it about halfway out freely. I filled it completely with water and a few weeks later it was back to normal, the cork expanded again due to the presence of water within the container. Finally, I emptied most of the water from the full bottle leaving only a few ounces. After about three months I observed the cork was still fairly tightly sealed.

I’ve also noticed my bottles that go untouched for long periods of time sometimes have notoriously hard to pull corks that feel as if they’re going to break off. Most likely because the corks are starting to dry out, my simple remedy for the situation has been to flip the bottle and wet the cork for a few seconds, then try again. Repeat as needed. Within a few attempts the cork is wet enough to move freely and I can pull it out without breaking it off inside the bottle.

Plenty of references to cork failure have been noted, and there have been reports of completely full unopened bottles experiencing loss of fill level due to evaporation over time. Old corks completely crumbling isn’t a tall tale either, we experienced it ourselves with a vintage bottle of Wild Turkey from the early 90’s.

Is the predominant culprit for bourbon that’s gone bad simply failed or tainted corks? And if so, are corks more likely to fail when fill level along with the relative humidity of the surrounding air decline?

Maybe a second bourbon storage experiment is in order…


Over these past few years I’ve been overwhelmed and appreciative of the tremendous positive response we’ve received as a result of this experiment, and thank everyone for waiting patiently as the results have unfolded.

But I would like to leave everyone with this: Our Bourbon Storage Experiment does not provide a final conclusion when it comes to bourbon and whiskey storage, and is not without its flaws. It is (hopefully) a very informative and interesting reference point, but it is representative of specific conditions, a specific set of taste preferences, a specific way of measuring change over time, and the transformation of a specific bourbon over time.

I hope this inspires others, and invite anyone to share their own experiences or experiments in the comments below or by dropping us a line.

Thanks, Andrew. That’s a great write up and very interesting experiment whose conclusions I largely agree with.

To the OP, here are a few corroborating and additional thoughts, nowhere near as well organized. Note that we drink very little bourbon, so almost all of this is relating to experiences with scotch, mostly single malt and generally, though not always, cask strength:

 I wouldn’t worry at all about your bottles sitting unopened for 10 years, unless you see a dramatic change in fill level, which would indicate a poor seal. I’ve had many, many wonderful whiskies out of bottles far older than that. In fact, I can’t remember ever thinking a bottle of previously unopened whisky with a good fill was over the hill. I’ve had blended whisky back to the late 19th century that has been very enjoyable.

 An exception to the above, in my opinion, are whiskies that were watered down too far to begin with. Since the alcohol level will go down with oxygen exposure, you run the risk of having them drop to an ABV that just isn’t fun anymore. Another reason to buy cask strength!

 I recommend sealing all unopened bottles you intend to keep for a while with sticky paraffin paper, especially if they are old. Cork stoppers are imperfect to begin with and get worse over time, and even screwcaps can allow some oxygen. Our whole collection is sealed this way.

 Whisky does change even in unopened bottles, but glacially if the seal is intact. I don’t know if those changes can or should be called improvements, though. In any case, I wouldn’t worry about it too much.

 Open bottles absolutely change with air. Some bottles improve (to my taste, anyway) dramatically with a little air at first, say over the first few days open – seems that whisky sometimes needs to breathe, just like wine.

 Very true that the more head space there is, the more quickly the whisky will degrade. I’ve observed this over 5-6 years myself, and my husband has shared with me the end of bottles he opened a decade or more ago – some even when he was in college! – and he has noted strong changes over that time, with the last few years a noticeable decline, though usually not enough to ruin the pleasure. Whisky is kind of his thing, so I trust him.

 Again, the ABV level to begin with can make a difference as to how long the whisky can go open without becoming dull.

 A supporting anecdote – a few years ago, my husband and I were visiting Islay, and were in a terrific bar that had the original release of 1974 Ardbeg Provenance open and priced attractively (still a very expensive dram). We shared a pour and it was among the top 2 or 3 whiskies of the trip. We went back to the same bar a few years later, and the same bottle was still there for the same price. After inspecting the bottle and seeing how low the fill was at that point, we decided it had been open too long at too low a fill to be worth it. Believe me - I’d have to feel pretty strongly that the whisky was pretty degraded to pass up '74 Ardbeg Provenance!

 100% agree to keep your bottles out of the sunlight, and avoid extremes of either temperature or humidity.

I hope that’s useful.

1 Like

Thank you both for the replies! This is all very useful and helpful. The vast majority of my bottles are single malts, so thank you Sarah for sharing your experiences in regards to these liquors. Andrew, thank you as well for the comprehensive write up and sharing results of the experiment. When I feel like liquor over wine, I have seen myself reaching for bourbons over my single malts lately but I seem to go back and forth. Based on the responses, I shouldn’t have much to worry about and will look into the paraffin paper as an extra layer of security particularly for the precious bottles. Cheers!

1 Like


That being said, and very useful information, I inherited a bottle of prohibition era scotch, given to my father by friends who owned an island off the Massachusetts coast. they found a buried cache of bottles from prohibition times and gifted one to my father. the bottle was half full when I inherited it, stoppered by a dry, crumbing cork. It had been open for at least 25 or more years, and since I’ve had it, has been stoppered by a simple cork as well.

The scotch has always been pristine. clear, beautifully defined, a bit more peaty than most any blend one would find in recent times, but no signs of damage from being open forever. The label is long gone. Per the capsule, it appears to be a Haig (so old Pinch) (I plan to email Stuart McNamara at Haigwhisky.com to see what else I can find out.)