I certainly understand the viewpoint that since Mr. McClendon is deceased, selling wines for his estate isn’t the same as selling the same wines would be were Aubrey still alive and awaiting trial. But then why aren’t the wines being just being sold without the Aubrey McClendon name attached to the wines? With Aubrey’s name attached to the wines, it strikes me as unseemly at least, if not more. That’s what bothers me.
Sorry, Arv, but I don’t see anyone raising a glass to AM, other than the house’s rake at HDH. Maybe I read your post incorrectly, but what people like AM ‘unleash’ is, nothing but heartache and misery in a greed-is-good belief.
Isn’t it better to be transparent and tell everyone exactly where it came from? I would have thought more transparency in the auction world is better than less.
Couldn’t resist looking at the collection on HDH. The large format collection is ridiculous to the point of being completely farcical. There are four 18L bottles of Cheval Blanc alone. I know he perished in a car wreck but being crushed to death by one of the melchoir bottlings would have been so much more appropos.
Like I said, a complex guy, and not an angel (for investors) but he’s had a hand in flooding the US with cheap oil and gas. $2.50 / gal gasoline is a tremendous gift to those struggling on the lower rungs of the US economic ladder. It also increases our foreign policy flexibility when we are less beholden to foreign energy.
I am not sure why people would be irate at HDH for helping dispose of these assets. Having his name associated with this sale likely increases the net proceeds, given his reputation for collecting. And whether its his family, or his oh so many creditors, maximizing the value received is in the sellers / intermediaries interest.
It is interesting that the sale is happening so quickly though - normally it takes a while to liquidate estates, especially large ones, and this doesn’t strike me as the absolutely first thing one needs to get rid of. But who knows, maybe these were pledged/collateral for a loan, and perhaps that contract specified his name could be used in disposing of them, as a subtle way to coax him to stay current on the loan. Some collectors prefer discretion when selling, and perhaps someone constantly soliciting investors would have been more keen to project an image of prosperity.