For my current palate, here is my thought process – I will choose one word each for the color, nose, body, palate, and finish.
LONG FORM: Let me start by describing what I like in a sentence for each, then I will try to narrow it down.
Color: Ruby to Magenta, almost opaque, not cloudy
Nose: I love when there are floral scents like roses or violets mixed with black and blue fruit that is not overly candied, balanced with some leather or tobaccy. lol.
Palate: Non-jammy black and blue fruits with some red fruit.
Body: I prefer a medium-to-full bodied wine
Finish: Long with medium soft tannins. I like one or more of: wood, toast, coffee, dusty earth, dusty leather, tar, spice, smoke, black pepper, stemminess (not sure what the word is but I notice it more on whole-cluster pinots).
Short Form - 5 words (In order of Nose, Color, Body, Palate, Finish)
Magenta, Violet, Blackberry, Stately, Complex
Words I decided NOT to use because they would allow wines I DID not like into the mix… 'powerful". This could have allowed imbalanced massive dark new world wines with harsh tannins, and $15 supermarket palate-bashers in the door. I narrowed it to stately, majestic or patrician to speak to power and grandeur but still with some refinement
The hardest one to choose was the finish, because I can’t group the flavors I like solely into wood or spice, it’s kind of a combo. At least complex gives the impression the wine is decently made, has a lot going on (not simplistic and one-note), and LIKELY has length to the finish if we are calling the finish complex. The challenge is, the finish could easily include flavors I don’t like with that descriptor.
This is tough!
Final answer: Magenta, Violet, Blackberry, Stately, Complex
Good to see you posting again. How about recommendations that are $75-$100 or under? So if people haven’t tried the wines you suggest it’s affordable. I’ve added my recommendations to see how I did for those folks as well. Cool game. So, picking a wine for you isn’t really quite fair. I know you pretty well and I think I have a good idea of where your palate lands. However, I think you’ll really enjoy 2012 Château Simone Palette Blanc. It reminds me a bit of Musar blanc (see…told you I was cheating) and when Doug & I tasted it last year we were both blown away by the wine.
Markus S: Fun, charming, balanced, contemplative, ready. Deltetto Roero Braja Riserva Soren Nielson: Mature, aromatic, balanced, expanding, eternal. Biondi-Santi Brunello di Montalcino Anton D: Well structured, austere, elegant, refined, deep. Elio Grasso Barolo Brian Tuite: Funky, bright, earth, complex, chewy. La Spinetta Sezzana Brian Tuite(2): Deep, meaty, bloody, balance, chalk. Voge Cornas VV IlkkaL: Savory, energetic, authentic, balanced, honest. G. Mascarello Freisa Mark Y: Complex, balance, mature, elegant, authentic/reflective of terroir. 1975 Château Lascombes (still under $100!) Tim McCracken: Bold, layered, refined, flowery, poetic. Chapoutier St. Joseph Blanc Les Granits Matthew King: Stony, airy, red-fruited, succulent, subtle. 2010 Travaglini Gattinara Richard Flack: Elegant, Balanced, Profound, Tertiary, Savoury. N.V. Rare Wine Co. Thomas Jefferson Special Reserve dsGriswold: Bright red berry, bracing acidity. JFM Nuits St. Georges 1er Cru Clos de la Maréchale T.L. Reasoner: Silky, balanced, layered, elegant, tasty. 2011-13 Poggio di Sotto Rosso Bob Parsons: Mineral, balanced, good acidity, fruity. Gérard Boulay Sancerre Monts Damnés Barry Paul Price: Magenta, Violet, Blackberry, Stately, Complex. Egelhoff Cabernet Randy Bowman: Fruit forward with long finish. Flor de Pingus
No they are not mutually exclusive. You can be pure and complex. With “pure” we wanted to encapsulate two ideas. One the obvious one; nothing extraneous in such as oak, and secondly allowing the “purity” of the terroir to show.