This. Have worked with Gallo for many years, they are patient and fanatical about quality. No, they are not trying to have one of their inexpensive wines upstage a 1st growth but every Gallo wine in every category, from jug wine on will beat their competition in sensory panels. That is where the patience (and marketing) pays off.
Tom Reed was also a co-founder, wasn’t he? And perhaps a majority owner? As a young lawyer in the 80s, I worked on the defense team for him when he faced insider trading charges. He was still an owner and quite involved then. (FYI, we got him acquitted.)
Gallo does now own the Monte Rosso Vineyard. I guess Joel can continue to make wines from that vineyard now, unlike all the others who have lost their access?
Still my favorite press release/corporate-speak turn of phrase.
Somewhere on my computer I think I still have the Word Doc of the prospectus a consulting firm sent to the tech company I worked for during the Internet 1.0 era, before I got into the wine biz. I loved those things. I’m sure the style has evolved considerably since then.
Interesting move and interesting timing. Richard Sands is completing the elimination of the market segment his father Marvin built the company on, most notably with Wild Irish Rose. Word is that Constellation was looking for 3 billion but had to settle for much less. I agree that Gallo has made a savvy pickup. The low end wine market may not be doing well right now, but Gallo is betting that in the long run this market will serve them just as well as it has ever since the end of Prohibition. Meanwhile, Constellation plans to use this money to finance their expansion into the THC consumables business through their alliance with Canopy. We’ll see how that works out. I will say that if Gallo were a public company I would buy them at anything approaching a reasonable price, meanwhile I’m not buying Constellation.
That came w/ the purchase of the LouisM.Martini brand, who were the owners. Gallo continued to sell MR
grapes to some long-time customers, but stopped that several yrs ago.
Tom
This is really interesting indeed - and I agree that Gallo seemingly has made out quite well with this. As others have said, with their recent vineyard purchases, they will need additional labels to put these wines into, and this certainly helps. I can’t believe that they’ll keep all of the winery production facilities purchased in the deal - watch for some of these to be dealt. This also buys Gallo LOTS more space on grocery store shelves without taking anything away - definitely the ‘General Mills’ of wineries, and so darned smart . . .
Not sure why the snark is necessary, Mel. If you read my posts, I (1) said my question was genuine (as opposed to critical or condescending), and (2) said "except some ITB’ers. This might be the first time anyone has ever come at me for inquiring about something in which they’re interested.
I’m still confused as to why folks find this interesting, and am curious to hear good faith answers. My working hypothesis is that “fans” of the wine industry care about this the same way a sports fan would care about the sale of a sports team. But that still doesn’t seem like it’s necessarily a good analogy.
There are so many posts on this board that don’t apply to everyone but may be of general interest. Don’t drink high end Burgundy? No problem - those posts may not be for you. Have no interest in Ray Walker? Same thing.
This is a near $2 Billion deal involving 2 major names in the wine business, and it’s a complete change of pace for Constellation to move away from less expensive wines to concentrate on higher priced ones - not something most would have expected just a few years back.