Kongsgaard letter is out...

[Nate_Simon]

@Charlie Fu

@Nate Simon

“Focused minerality?” I find it hard to focus on anything other than the absurd price tag…another producer firmly stuck in 2003. Circular file material.

to each their own?

No. I am correct.

[CFu]

@Nate Simon

@Charlie Fu

@Nate Simon

“Focused minerality?” I find it hard to focus on anything other than the absurd price tag…another producer firmly stuck in 2003. Circular file material.

to each their own?

No. I am correct.

pass

[Mike_Maguire]

@Nate Simon

“Focused minerality?” I find it hard to focus on anything other than the absurd price tag…another producer firmly stuck in 2003. Circular file material.

+1

[Ed_Bernasky]

I saw the regular Kongsgaard Chard recently at a big discounter for $65…seemed like a blowout price.

what is it from the list?

[Russ_Williams]

@Seo S a l i m i

ITB guys will know better than me, but I’m betting we’ll see this getting dumped cheap via retail pretty soon.

I’ll take that bet as well. The only problem is the fact the retail channel is already backed up with tons of wine it can’t sell.

[RichSteinberg]

The regular chard is $75.

[Eric_Lundblad]

@gene keenan

I have been on the list for 3-4 years, never bought anything and was still offered 7.5 cases this year.
I agree with Rico; I’d rather have 3 bottles of GC Chablis than 1 bottle of The Judge. The pricing is just shameful IMO but more power to them if they can get it.

I agree (well, I don’t really know cuz I’ve never had a Judge*, but I love Chablis**)…the really sad question is which wine would live longer?



*: If someone would like to correct this situation, I have Marcassin Estate Chard to share

**: I also have a variety of GC Chablis to share if you prefer