Exactly. A buyer can choose to make several bottles into one lot, by paying up as such. Otherwise, they are each available separately. Everybody can then be happy, not griping-----even the original poster, if willing to pay accordingly.
2002 Pride Mountain Petite Sirah. I like Petite Sirah, and found that Winebid is a good place to find reasonably priced aged PS. It saves buying it new and waiting 15+ years for the stuff to come around.
I often buy single bottles to fill verticals etc, but apparently it’s rude to break his set.
Sorry but I just do not follow the logic, and frankly it wouldn’t make much difference if I could. Auctions are competitive, and I am pretty sure the seller does want one class of buyer, but wants to maximize his money. Making it artificially uncompetitive is a little strange.
This is a great board, and I am thankful to be a part of it. That being said, one thing that is sometimes lacking is empathy. Carlos already addressed it, but John, I’m sorry it didn’t work out for you. Better luck next time.
Mentioned above, but my thought process in the past when bidding on Winebid. Which I don’t do anymore (too many corked bottles).
Oh, I’d love to try that wine. Oh look, there’s two of them! But one person is trying to get both of them, they must really want it too. Ok, I’ll just bid on one maybe that way we each get a bottle.
Actually, it did work out and I got both. The other guy tried a few more bids but then got tired. A typical auction result in the end.
Thanks for the thoughts everyone, even if most of them were contrary to mine. That happens here sometimes. And I think this thread has a long way to go to be the worst thread ever on WB. That’s a helluva measuring stick.
…John, saw some more great older PS on Winebid last night. A few bottles of '97 La Jota PS. Hopefully you were able to snag some and right some wrongs.
We need to prosecute those wrong-doers. Who wants to blow the whistle on them and their wrong actions?
By the way, can anybody tell me what initially happened?