WB 'Wine Rules' To Consider

[larry_schaffer]

Here’s another one:

It’s always worth it to purchase a $100 wine for only $18 - and I can always justify why . . .

[Rodrigo_B]

Here’s another one:

It’s always worth it to purchase a $100 wine for only $18 - and I can always justify why . . .

It’s only worth it if it’s by the case!

[PeterH]

“A wine is worth whatever a knowledgeable (important qualifier) buyer is willing to pay.”

I invite dissension.

“Wine is much too important to allocate on the basis of ability to pay. It should be reserved only for those able to to appreciate it fully.”

[Nate_M]

“A wine is worth whatever a knowledgeable (important qualifier) buyer is willing to pay.”

I invite dissension.

“Wine is much too important to allocate on the basis of ability to pay. It should be reserved only for those able to to appreciate it fully.”

Good Rule…too bad it can’t be so.

[Paul_abbott]

“Insert name of critic here “ has been a malignant influence on wine and has distorted markets with their mediocre palette.

[Tomas_Costa]

Young wine consumers today are a bunch of poor sods, because they won’t get to afford the wines I was buying 40 years ago from the only wine regions which were not cottage industries.