Now that most 2018s are sold, us winery owners/winemakers have shifted our focus to the 2019 vintage in barrel. Almost all of us have racked the 2019 wines at least once, they have 13 months in oak and we are getting an idea which lots are doing better and what our blends and wines will look like. I do feel confident we can make a general verdict on it, already.
It’s an “excellent” vintage but probably not a “great, great” vintage like 2018. The 2018 vintage is up there with 2013, 2002, 1994, 1991; most likely approachable now (if you can tolerate tannin) but also will age for decades. The 18s had everything.
The 2019 vintage is, quality-wise, up there with 2010, 2014, 2006, 1996, 1992. No one will be complaining about 2019 in my opinion and almost everyone I know if awfully happy with em. They have potential to get even better, too. I feel the southern half of the valley did a bit better than the northern and the floor better than the mountains 2/3 of the time.
And given the worries about 2020 and potential smoke taint, I actually expect a pretty strong demand for the 19s, as many collectors and fans will be tightening their selection in 2022 when the 2020s come out and will want to “load up” with enough 19s to get through the gap. Locally, the prices for bulk 2019 juice in barrel is up 100% since the fires, as wineries want more of the top excess juice to release, knowing revenues will drop in 2022.
2019 started with huge amounts of rain, over 26 inches between Jan and Feb, alone. A lot of vines used all that water to produce lots of foliage and thus it was important that vineyard owners went through and cut out excess growth and dropped excess clusters. Vines don’t know we want to make great wine and thus respond to what nature gives them, so all that water made them want to produce a lot of everything. The soils stayed damp 12-inches down even by July, so many top vineyards basically could dry farm if they wanted, for the rest of the vintage.
The rest of the season was moderate, with very few heat events, and also very little rain at the end, so we could hang and hang. Brix at harvest were standard for what each winemaker usually prefers, acid was moderate and tannins just a touch bigger than usual. Production size was average for Napa.
If you like to buy your favorite producers in most vintages, this will be one you want. I find (as do many of my winemaker friends) that the 2019 Cabs have a somewhat “linear” mouthfeel and slight “leanness” that our 2014s had when young. In my own case, I found my 14s quite linear until the last 12 months, when they started blossoming beautifully. It also reminds me of the under-rated 2006 vintage for Napa, which was much the same; required a bit of age, 5 years or so, and then open up into really beautiful wines that have stuffing to age. I think 06 has turned out to be a better vintage than 07, in retrospect. And 2014 better than 2015.
Putting on my collectors hat, the back-to-back 2018/2019 combo reminds me of how 1992 followed 1991 and 1995 followed 1994 and 2014 followed 2013… excellent but just a tick behind the vintage that preceded it. It may not bring out the Cab buyers who only collect the top 2 or 3 vintages of a decade but will be made up for by those who “load up” for the potential drought of options coming in 2022.
Hope this helps!