I’ve been reading about this process in anticipation of a small lot of wine (zinfandel from my father’s vineyard in Yolo County, a little west of Winters) that I’m going to make this fall.
For those not familiar with the process, it involves keeping the must (the mash of juice, skin, seeds and possibly stems from after you crush the grapes) chilled for 3-7 days at something like 45-55 degrees, before then letting the must warm up and the fermentation begin. The beliefs seem to be that (a) you get a darker, smoother, fresher-tasting wine by having extracted some compounds from the skins and seeds in the cool enviroment and prior to fermentation having begun, and, to a much lesser extent, (b) you increase the efficacy of the native yeasts if you intend to ferment without adding commercial yeast.
I’m curious what the views on here are about cold maceration, both from the winemaker’s perspective and from the customer’s perspective. A few specific questions:
(1) [Since everything on this board seems to be viewed through this prism, I might as well ask] Is this viewed as an overly interventionist / modernist technique? Do all or most of the wineries commonly considered the low alcohol / traditional / minimalist ones on this board avoid using this technique, and if so, why? Where in the spectrum of intervention does this technique fall – is it a modest affront to minimalism, or a big one?
(2) Do wineries generally do this or not do this as a matter of regular course, or does the winemaker make a decision on a case-by-case basis, on a varietal by varietal basis, and/or on a vineyard by vineyard basis? And if the latter, what is generally the basis for deciding whether to do or not to do a cold maceration?
(3) What are the downsides to doing a cold maceration? Is it just a matter of maybe the resulting wine not being in the style that a given winemaker may desire, or are there other considerations that weigh against doing it?
Thanks in advance for thoughts and opinions of all sorts.