In the if-I-had-known-then vein, I wish I had more Allemand and Clos Rougard. Prices had just started to rise when I tasted them and I concluded that I’d missed the boat. In fact the engines had started but it hadn’t left the dock. Oh well.
Also, I should have signed up for Monte Bello futures a decade ago.
I look at the question more of: which wines do I consistently wish I had more of? That answer is pretty easy:
Austrian Riesling and Gruner (primarily Alzinger, Prager, Brundlmayer, Hirtzberger, Knoll, Schloss Gobelsberg)
German Riesling (both sweet and dry; both young and aged) (more than anything, JJ Prum and Wili Schaefer)
Champagne (big house and grower; fancy and cheap; young and old) (more than anything, Krug, Dom, Vilmart)
Chablis
Thinking about this question, I came to a conclusion about my own buying. By a considerable margin, I buy more Red Burg than anything–both in terms of $$ and volume. But I don’t actually enjoy Red Burg much more (perhaps not any more) than the categories mentioned above. I think my Red Burg buying is motivated nearly as much by the collecting/academic instinct–the desire to try new vintages and vineyards and producers and dive into the minutia–as it is enjoyment of the wine. Burgundy provides the most depth in terms of exploration. It’s a lot more expensive (and in a sense, a lot more interesting) to explore a bunch of different Chambolle 1ers than it is to compare big-house Champagnes in a given vintage. But I more often crave Champagne. So while I could certainly point to a ton of Burg producers I wish occupied a bigger position in my cellar, that’s in some a desire to fill out my knowledge (satisfy my curiosity) rather than have a greater quantity of delicious burgs (which I have a ton of).
The easy answer is what’s missing from my cellar in terms of what I love to drink but don’t have enough of? Whites and Champagne.
Most of my wishes had to do with price increases, but there are certainly times where I should have stuck with the producers I loved instead of chasing the next best thing.
d’Angerville
Bertheau
Taittinger
Montelena
Williams Selyem
Spottswoode
Well, the ones I don’t have… DRC, Rousseau, C Tremblay… or very few Mugnier or not enough Chave
Then, are those I have but too young to enjoy them yet: , Roumier, Mugneret Gibourg, Barthod, Castagnier, Bart (for the grand crus, Marsannay OK), PYCM …
Then, those I have enough, at all degree of age in significant quantity Grivot Fourrier, D Laurent, Vernay, German rieslings (not many old but I like them young, I will not give names as they have limited acrage…)
Definitely! Love that quality about it. I like wines aged sous voile for 6-7 years that don’t make it to vin jaune, too. They happen to be lighter on the pocketbook. Cheers!
With respect to the top Champagnes, there is an added advantage that many of them release wines at 10 years old or older. Get a real head start on aging these.
For whatever reason, Piedmont has been the region that was the hardest for me to learn the top producers and top vineyards. Not a region you want to get to late in the game on cellaring and collecting.
I agree. I have learned about a couple of producers where I like the wine and the prices are relatively reasonable, but I cannot buy them because it is insane to buy young Barolo when I am almost 65.