I just posted this on the commerce corner promontory but i think here is better.
I am only a few years into this wine thing so excuse my ignorance here when I ask this.
On another thread a poster made the statement that napa is the one place specific enough to grow good cabernet grapes. So specific that the best American wines come from Napa. In fact, even within Napa there are only so many acres of vinyards that can grow the best of the best. So if Promontory or anybody else for that matter wants to produce a $300 -$1200 single bottle of great Napa Cab, AND all those great vineyards are already being sourced, where did these grapes come from? What wine was Promontory two years ago? Meaning that certainly the vineyards they are sourcing had to have been something else and no matter which celebrity wine producer now is handling those grapes and overseeing the production, those grapes can really only be what they were meant to be. No?
Honestly, I am wondering if something just got rebranded and the price just went up.
As I understand it, they bought the property that used to be used for Ladera’s ‘Lone Canyon’ bottling. That wine was good, but it was priced at around $70.
Yes, this is an interesting issue. The Harlan team will likely replant some, invest, farm better, blend better, (clearly market better) la, la la… But Ladera 07 is 65 bucks and Promontory 09 is 400 bucks (a 600%+ increase in price over 2 years). It is hard to believe the could turn that much better that fast- so are you pre-funding their buildout/investment?
It seems the big dollars in Napa are beginning to hollow out a niche similar to another highly successful american business model- Private Equity. Buy something undervalued/utilized, re-engineer, re-market, resell for a handsome profit. Bad/Good- not really my point, it’s just the reality of being able to do so when there is a profit motive.
They have ripped out a large amount of the acreage and replanted it at much higher density following the flow of the mountains instead of terraces. Farming it at much lower yields and bio dynamically. Of course more barrel costs (100% new oak) etc etc. Not saying that the wine deserves a $400 price point, but the fixed costs are far larger than when Ladera owned the property. Land prices have changed a lot since the property was purchased back in 1996/1997 by Ladera.
So Matt et al, it if was a new release and it was, say $150, would that have made it more attractive? What price point would have done the trick for oyu? Just curious . . .