Doesn’t fit the price range but if I were eating dinner there and having a multi course tasting menu, I’d probably go with one of the 2013 Huets for under $100 or perhaps one of the Alsatians for under $150.
If Bordeaux, the 1986 Gruaud-L is in great shape now. Drank it some weeks ago (New Year dinner, TN posted). -Highly Recommended.
If it’s is a Burg, I would go for the 2001 Leroy “Milieu” - Assuming it’s the Domaine. Good age, very nice price, and super rare (sub 600 btls/year). Hard to find this gem again.
I drank the weaker 1997 “Milieu” some years ago, and it is the finest '97 Burg I’ve had. Dom. Leroy rarely disappoints.
It is interesting that several people are recommending 2005 upper end Burgundies. I have not had a single one at the level of wines that some are recommending that is anywhere near ready to drink (even my 2005 Truchot Bourgogne Rouge is still too young!!!). Could someone tell me why you would spend $500 to drink a tannic closed wine? This is not for putting away - it is for drinking.
Good question for the somm, is something tannic and closed, or primary but still balanced? Other questions I ask might myself are what is the relative value with respect to market and release pricing, is it something I’ve wanted to try, and how hard is it to source otherwise? Also a lot of places lists thin out pretty quickly or get prohibitively expensive at 15-20 years of age for top names.
Young wines are drinkable, just different. The fact that tannic, rich red wines can’t be enjoyed young is one of those myths that mysteriously hang on. And any 2005 Burgundy is CERTAINLY drinkable now.