We could ban stupidity but the poor mods would be overwhelmed.
OMG I just wasted half my evening! But I did learn that Victor was pimping PC and Ken was waiting eagerly for MyWines!
It’s at off site storage. 
We have mods here? ![[stirthepothal.gif]](/uploads/db3686/original/2X/f/f40faec63ca1018898a40805efbf9f0066a3d205.gif "[stirthepothal.gif]"){kind=small}
[personal attack removed by admin - user warned]
![[welldone.gif]](/uploads/db3686/original/2X/f/fc9709a841aa9379fd892a9cf0b535b05f473b86.gif "[welldone.gif]"){kind=small}
No ban…please.
Premier Cru still holding it for you? 
Seemed pretty tame to me…and true.
Be good re PC:
Two wines enter, one wine leaves.
Oh god, f*ck right off with this.
This thread is straight up stoking the fire and you know it.
did he really write flamers?
wow.
Or?
I have been very tempted to put a few posters on permanent ignore, but have held off. The personal attacks are tiring, but …
the threads continue to have a high enough signal to noise ratio to justify their existence. I do support creating 1-2 more sub threads.
-
focused on bankruptcy proceedings news
-
focused on advice on how to file your paperwork with the court (assuming you fail with the CC route)
this would pair well with the separate charge back thread.
definitely not. We can’t have non attorneys or even attorneys giving this type of legal advice unless they are retained as counsel. The exposure would be on us for advocating such a thing
legal advice? or just practical advice? chill out fu
getting advice on how to file paperwork with the court is not “practical advice” it’s legal advice. If we create a subforum for how do submit paperwork with the court we are on the hook. I’m telling you why it won’t be done. It has nothing to do with “chilling out”, it has everything to do with exposure.
Me ? im sweet and innocent, have no idea what you mean
[/quote]
[/quote]
Or?
[/quote]
Your offlines look like fun Brian