Vin Jaune tasting

Thanks to Joe Perry for putting together a wonderful menu and having us into his home on a weeknight to dive into some Vin Jaune.



I discovered Vin Jaune in NYC when I approached Crush and asked for an interesting and hard to source white - they suggested a Vin Jaune.



To my taste, these wines are best with food - more so than other wines imo. That said, I wouldn’t hesitate to drink any of them sans food, except the angry, angry Lornet.



The wines:



2005 Domaine de Montbourgeau L’Etoile

We started with this gem, courtesy of Michael Malinoski. Very fresh and clean. Reminds of an oily/unctuous Soave - maybe not the best comparison, given I haven’t tasted much of either, but that’s my impression . Really dig the floral, feminine aspect, remains elegant and light, something I definitely wouldn’t say for the Vin Jaune to follow.



2000 Domaine de Montbourgeau L’Etoile Cuvée Spéciale

Chalk chalk chalk! So much darker in color than the 05 L’Etoile, and possessing much more complexity and weight. Very dry, despite having delicious nougat and caramel, especially on the long finish. Mouth coating and really sticks to the palate.



1998 Jacques Puffeney Arbois Vin Jaune

Compared longside the 1999, I thought this was more drinkable/approachable but the 1999 had more “stuffing” for long term. Struck me as rounded, with none of the angularity of some of the other Vin Jaunes. Softer, with minerals, green herbs and sexy spice.



1999 Jacques Puffeney Arbois Vin Jaune

More for the long haul than the 1998, but to my taste wasn’t as approachable for current drinking. Reminiscent of creamy, buttery popcorn - but with a sharp spine of acidity that tingles the tongue. I know acidic and creamy seem at opposition, but the acidity keeps lashing the cream back upon the palate in waves. Not as elegant as the 1998, but more of a beast to be reckoned with.



1997 Château D’Arlay Côtes du Jura Vin Jaune

This was an oddball. Started with this mellow nose that later turned into a funkfest. Not sure if there was a flaw here that developed with aeration or if it just helped peel back the covers on the odor. Better on the palate, but I didn’t spend too much time given the weirdness.



1999 Frédéric Lornet Arbois Vin Jaune

I underlined white chocolate and I recall it being pretty intense in the bouquet. Despite the alluring nose, this wine seemed angry for being roused from slumber, unleashing laser beams of acidity. Enamel-scraper for sure. Tough to evaluate now, but I bet it lasts forever. The only wine that was really tough for me to drink now, despite the warnings that Vin Jaune must be 60 years old to drink.



1999 Marcel Cabelier Château-Chalon

I found this similar in style to the 1999 Puffeney, perhaps with a gentler edge. Settled down nicely, I found it the best match with the chicken liver ravioli.

Puffeney kicks balls! Crush organized a great tasting of Jura wines last year. The Chardonnay was amazing.

I have to say this was one of the more eye-opening tastings I have ever been a part of. Here you have wines that are purposely oxidized, are meant to age forever, and are little known for the most part. Yet, they are incredibly complex aromatically and have such cut and distinction and length on the palate (even for such total youngsters for their ilk). And these wines pair marvelously well with food (specifically Comte cheese). Yes, they are really hard to find and they take a specific setting to appreciate (don’t just throw one into a blind tasting), but if given the proper context they can wow you.

Peter, great notes and thanks for posting. I will try to get mine up soon. Looking at my notebook, these are some of the craziest notes I think I’ve ever taken!

-Michael

And here I thought PMC only drank inky CA syrahs!

Nope, just 2005 Burgs…

Totally agree - was excited to take part, well worth the hour-long drive up and back. Food was great too - don’t know what Joe was complaining about re: his culinary skills.

Amazing how, at least for few we tasted, they’re so different. I’d love to try a 20 year old to see how it tastes aged.

Perry said it takes grapes from one full fruit-bearing vine to make one glass. Not sure how many glasses other grapes producer from a vine, but sounds impressive!

Who knows how true any of these things are, but I can sort of recall reading the same thing about Yquem–one vine=one glass.

Well, I finally got a chance to get my notes from this wonderful evening at Joe’s typed up and posted. Looking back at Peter’s notes now, I think we were actually very closely aligned in terms of our impressions.

I’ve wanted to try these wines from the Jura for some time now and was really excited to have this opportunity to try several of them at once to begin to get a handle on whether I would like their unusual oxidized style. As I hope the notes convey, my reaction was one of intense intellectual intrigue and for the most part fine tasting pleasure.

2005 Domaine de Montbourgeau L’Etoile. Before we went off on the wild side, we started on the mild side. The nose here is a bit quiet, with scents of crisp minerals, limestone chalk, daffodils and only faint oxidative notes. On the palate, it displays a certain lushness down the middle, with crisply-defined edges and an airy sort of after-taste. The fruit is rounded and goes down real easy, with decent length. It is a nice introduction, but in retrospect only hints at the unique nature of the other wines on the table.

2000 Domaine de Montbourgeau L’Etoile Cuvee Speciale. Wow, this ratchets things up several notches in just about every way. The nose features a panoply of wild aromas ranging from oily walnuts and pounded beef jerky to chalky limestone, dried sea salt, mineral spirits and latex. I’m sure this sounds odd but it is actually both entrancingly complex and decidedly inviting. In the mouth, the very first thing that unwaveringly comes to my mind is rich lobster bisque, complete with a dollop of sherry. At times, I am also reminded of thin-sliced roast beef au jus. Obviously, that salty/savory, surf ‘n turf dynamic is a big part of what this wine is about. At the same time, a starburst of acidity lends an absolute electric feel to the wine that simply never wavers. One of the fascinating aspects about the wine is that it almost seems to act like an aerosol spray—with the most intense concentration of flavor coming as the wine evaporates off the tongue after swallowing. It is there that the lovely nutty notes come out most strongly, along with flavors of caramel, marzipan, Montelimar nougat, vanilla bean and peanut brittle. The texture is oily, but the wine is barely medium-bodied. It finishes quite dry, with all that great inner perfume lasting a good long while. Needless to say, I very much dig this wine on a variety of levels.

1998 Jacques Puffeney Arbois Vin Jaune. This Vin Jaune offering is a bit mellower and perhaps more refined on the nose than many of the others this night. It features lots of fresh garden herbs, limestone and warm pecan aromas, along with something reminiscent of a knife-sharpening stone and oil. It really fans out on the palate, touching all the corners of the mouth and delivering its flavors directly and forcefully. It is beautifully layered and open, with less obviously crisp contours than most. It delivers plenty of flavors along the lines of waxy yellow fruit, lime peel, botanical herbs, ash-covered rind and sea salt. It finishes very well-balanced, featuring interesting macadamia and beeswax flavors that linger.

1999 Jacques Puffeney Arbois Vin Jaune. The bouquet on the '99 Puffeney seems to have less of the nutty overtones exhibited by the '98 and instead veers more toward exotic and complex notes of apricot pit, wet chalk dust, lemon/lime zest, black Necco wafer, browning canteloupe rind and old brass. It comes across as generally more concentrated than the '98, with a rich feel up front that turns more restrained through the mid-palate. The flavors are not quite as immediate as the '98, nor do they fan out quite the same way. Instead, it only slowly unfolds and never really shows all it will have to offer in the future. Although it seems creamy, there is a marked tingly feel around the edges of the tongue throughout and there is soft but persistent acidity that is a constant companion. It is certainly more structured than its relatively open-knit older brother and it perhaps exhibits better overall balance. The finish is absolutely mouthwatering, though later in the evening it turns drier. I preferred the '98’s more giving nature, but this seems destined to be the longer-lived of the duo.

1999 Frederic Lornet Arbois Vin Jaune. Wow, this opens up as an intense, angry and almost violent wine—sort of burning the nostrils with alcohol paint thinner and glue notes riding atop rotting fruit compost early on. Eventually, though, that all begins to recede, allowing much friendlier aromas like warm caramel, vanilla bean, roasted nuts, juniper berry, rock candy and pineapple rind to filter in. In the mouth, it is thankfully a lot easier to like. The initial attack is rather vibrant and the wine stays exciting throughout. It has fine weight and density married to great verve. Like the ’00 Montbourgeau Cuvee Speciale, I again notice that it delivers much of its most interesting flavors as it evaporates off the tongue on the finish. Flavors of dried pineapple cubes, pink grapefruit, honeyed fig, dark caramel and lemon peel leave a lasting impression.

1997 Château d’Arlay Cotes du Jura Vin Jaune. While I didn’t particularly love the nose of the previous wine, I actually hated the nose of this wine. It smells decidedly medicinal and industrial to me-- with some vinyl paint, car lube, motor oil and plastic aromas that I find truly offensive. It is much cleaner on the palate, where it is rich, round and a bit chewy-textured, but with a nice acidic twang to drive it along. It displays a decidedly more fruit-forward style than the other wines in the line-up. Also, the finish is probably the driest of the set, lending a more austere edge to the back.

1999 Marcel Cabelier Chateau-Chalon. This wine is less obviously oxidized than most and also seems to contain its alcohol content the most easily. It features fine aromas of steeped lemon peel, spun caramel, salty walnuts, brass, wet stones, bitter grapefruit and dried peach pit in perhaps the freshest style of the night. There is a rich vein of salinity running through the palate that makes it very interesting. There is also a nice shot of bright citrus fruit and spiced green apple flavor. Again, it is less obviously oxidized than the other wines, with a spicy, tingly and fresh finish that is layered and wonderfully refreshing. This is a truly great food wine and one of my favorites of the entire tasting.

On the whole, these have to be some of the wildest tasting notes I can ever recall writing. But I have to say that I was totally taken aback by the singular character of these wines and found myself drawn to them in a way I never expected. Now I just have to get my hands on some bottles that have been aged like 40 years to see what THAT fuss is all about…

We ended the evening with some wonderful desserts and Joe hit the wine fridge to pull out this inspired choice:

1997 Huet Vouvray Moelleux 1ere Trie Clos du Bourg. The bouquet here is lovely and welcoming—with aromas of nectarine, cherry pit, quince paste, kiwi and soft graphite that turn just a bit sweeter with air time. In the mouth, it is gently sweet and round-edged, with fine levels of tangy acidity. This is certainly is a wine of fine elegance, balance and restraint. The sugar is “just there” as a well-integrated component. I could really drink a lot of this, but it seems to disappear awfully quick!

-Michael

Thanks dudes. The more I hear about these Jura bottles the more I am interested to try.